Frequently asked questions: Corporations (Aboriginal and Torres Strait
Islander) Act 2006
Contents
GENERAL
DEVELOPING THE NEW LAW
IMPACT ON OTHER LAWS
HOW WILL CORPORATIONS SWITCH OVER TO THE CATSI ACT?
IMPACT ON CORPORATIONS
REGISTRAR’S ROLE AND POWERS
ASSISTANCE FOR CORPORATIONS
PENALTIES AND OFFENCES
OTHER QUESTIONS ABOUT THE CATSI ACT
Back to top
- There are about 2500 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander corporations
formerly registered under the Aboriginal Councils and Associations Act 1976,
now registered under the Corporations (Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander)
Act 2006 (CATSI Act).
- Estimates suggest that there are at least as many as that again of
Indigenous corporations registered under other legislation.
- Corporations deliver a range of services—many deliver essential services
to remote communities or hold land.
- Most are publicly funded but some generate significant income through
agreements and business operations.
- Most native title corporations are registered under the ACA Act, as are
many remote Indigenous arts centres.
- The ACA Act was 30 years old and out of line with modern corporate
governance and accountability standards of the Corporations Act 2001.
- The ACA Act also needed modernising to respond to the risks and
requirements of modern Indigenous corporations.
- The CATSI Act was developed following an independent review of the ACA
Act in 2001–02.
- The CATSI Act was developed after a process of independent review and
broad consultation over two years, as well as further research conducted
by the Registrar's office.
- The consultation included:
- two workshops held in Alice Springs
- questionnaires being sent to all ACA Act associations and many other
Indigenous organisations
- advertisements being placed in Indigenous publications and on
Indigenous radio calling for submissions and comments
- the Registrar's website including details of the review and copies of
the consultation papers and the questionnaires for Indigenous
corporations
- consultation papers being sent to key stakeholders seeking
submissions
- information sheets being distributed
- briefings being provided to ATSIC Regional Councils and the ATSIC
Board.
- When the CATSI Bill was introduced into the Australian Parliament in
October 2005, the Senate Legal and Constitutional Affairs Committee
received submissions on the Bill and held public hearings. Feedback
received from corporations and other stakeholders during the Senate
hearings and consultation conducted helped the Registrar improve the Bill.
- Before the CATSI Act was passed in October 2006, the government made a
number of amendments to improve the Act. For example, some of the
amendments allowed the Registrar to provide exemptions from particular
provisions dealing with internal governance. This made the Act more
flexible and reduced red tape.
- Information on the CATSI Act has also been presented to many
Indigenous corporations at ORIC workshops and information sessions.
Valuable feedback has been received from corporations during these
workshops and sessions.
Back to top
The review recommended that:
- the special incorporation needs of Indigenous people be met through a new
and modern incorporation statute with special forms of regulatory assistance
to support good corporate governance
- the ACA Act needed to be replaced as it was out-of-date and deficient.
The CATSI Act implements the key recommendations of the review (See the
ORIC fact sheet on what recommendations were not implemented and why, The
Bill and the review—some differences).
The main elements of the CATSI Act are summarised in the brochure, Get in
on the Act.
The changes:
- promote good governance and management
- allow for modernised corporate governance practices and accountability
standards
- improve security for funding bodies, creditors and other parties doing
business with corporations
- provide flexibility for groups and communities when designing a
corporation’s constitution.
Back to top
The CATSI Act is bigger than the ACA Act because:
- it incorporates many provisions from the Corporations Act, rather than
just referring to them
- it contains new rights, such as rights to review decisions and members’
rights, and duties such as those for directors and officers
- it provides greater flexibility for corporations in constitutional design
and gives the Registrar more discretion to allow for flexible administration
- the language of the Corporations Act has been used in many areas to ensure
consistency and to reflect existing case law.
Back to top
- Under the Native Title Act, most native title bodies, including PBCs
or prescribed bodies corporate (also called registered native title bodies
corporate or RNTBCs) that hold or manage native title, must incorporate
under the ACA Act. This will continue under the new legislation.
- The CATSI Act makes sure that when a person has a responsibility under
the Native Title Act it does not conflict with what they are required to
do under the CATSI Act. This means many provisions have been tailored for
directors, managers and employees of native title bodies.
- There is an ORAC paper—‘Interaction between the CATSI Act and the
Native Title Act’—as well as a Native Title fact sheet
available on the ORIC website www.oric.gov.au.
- The CATSI Act maximises alignment with the Corporations Act while it
retains its purpose as a special measure for the benefit of Aboriginal and
Torres Strait Islander corporations.
- The Corporations Act was amended by the Corporations Amendment
(Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Corporations) Act 2006.
- These amendments are in their own Act because the Corporations Act is
a special law which requires the agreement of the states and territories
to be changed.
- These amendments remove duplication between similar provisions in the
CATSI Act and the Corporations Act and ensure that officers disqualified
from managing Indigenous corporations under the CATSI legislation will
also be disqualified from managing mainstream corporations.
- The CATSI Act aligns with the Corporations Act in the following ways:
- It introduces the same duties for directors and officers under the
CATSI Act.
- It ensures that there is no possibility of dual regulation of
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander corporations by ASIC.
- It streams corporations according to their size.
- It requires related party transactions to be disclosed.
- It introduces penalties and offences that mirror those in the
Corporations Act.
- It creates a register of disqualified directors.
- It introduces members’ rights that mirror those in the Corporations
Act.
Back to top
A special Act was passed in the parliament to move ACA Act corporations
across to the new system as seamlessly as possible—the Transitional Act (Corporations
(Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander) Consequential, Transitional and
Other Measures Act 2006). On 1 July 2007 all corporations incorporated
under the ACA Act became corporations under the CATSI Act.
The Transitional Act will maintain the existing legal status, office bearers,
assets and liabilities of all ACA Act corporations. This will minimise the
administrative burden on corporations while providing certainty of operation for
corporations, their members and stakeholders.
Corporations need to:
- find out what size they are under the CATSI Act. See ‘How big is big?’—the
April 2007 edition of ORIC’s newsletter, The Oracle
- understand their new reporting requirements for 2008–09, depending on
their size (they continue to report as they did under the ACA Act for 2007–08)
- start putting their Indigenous Corporation Number (ICN) on their important
documents
- start using new terminology (governing committee = directors, governing
committee members = directors, public officers = secretaries or contact
persons)
- remember that there is no need to panic—corporations have until 30 June
2009 to fully transition to the new legislation.
Contact ORIC on 1800 622 431 or
info@oric.gov.au if you need help.
- The registration process will be similar to that of the ACA Act.
However there are new requirements to make sure groups are ready for
incorporation. For example, to show that a group is ready they must have
the names and contact details for directors and contact person and a copy
of the prepared rule book. They also need to show that 75 per cent of the
people who have consented to become members authorise the applicant to
apply for incorporation.
- Corporations will have up to two years to comply with most internal
governance rules requirements of the CATSI Act. This gives them a
significant period of time to hold meetings so that they can make the
necessary changes.
- For the 2006–07 financial year corporations will report as they did
under the ACA Act. For the 2007–08 financial year corporations that have
not yet moved across to the CATSI Act will also have the option of
reporting under the old reporting requirements. If they want to do this,
though, they must write to the Registrar to request it. This will give
corporations enough time to prepare for any new reporting requirements
under the CATSI Act.
- The transitional arrangements are set out in a separate Act called the
Corporations (Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander) Consequential,
Transitional and Other Measures Act 2006 (the Transitional Act). The
Transitional Act repeals the ACA Act and updates references to the ACA Act
in a number of other Commonwealth laws.
Back to top
- Under the Transitional Act any pending applications or decisions by
the Registrar under the ACA Act will be taken to be applications or
decisions made under the new Act. This removes the burden on corporations
of having to re-apply under the new regime.
- Yes, but there will be a two-year period allowed for corporations to
do this.
- A rule book tool is available to help corporations make the changes—it
guides corporations through the rules, allowing greater flexibility for
making sure it reflects a corporation’s needs and circumstances. This will
be available in hard copy and electronically. See more information on the
rule book etool
here.
Back to top
Corporations will be streamed into small, medium and large for reporting
purposes.
Small corporations:
- will only have to provide a general report that includes details of
members, directors, employees, income and assets.
Medium corporations:
- will have to report in a similar way to how they do under the ACA Act.
Large corporations:
- will have to prepare a more comprehensive report, similar to what is
required under the Corporations Act
- will still have to submit audited financial statements because they have
more resources available than small or medium corporations. This is consistent
with mainstream requirements for large corporations.
Levels for financial reporting and streaming are defined in the CATSI
Regulations rather than the CATSI Act so that they can be altered more easily if
required.
A small corporation will have at least TWO of the following:
- consolidated gross operating income of less than $100,000
- consolidated gross assets of less than $100,000
- less than 5 employees
A large corporation will have at least TWO of the following:
- consolidated gross operating income of $5 million or more
- consolidated gross assets of $2.5 million or more
- more than 24 employees
All other corporations are medium and typically have:
- consolidated gross operating income between $100,000 and $5 million
- consolidated gross assets between $100,000 and $2.5 million
- between 5 and 24 employees
For the 2006–07 financial year corporations will report as they did under the
ACA Act. For the 2007–08 financial year corporations that have not yet moved
across to the CATSI Act will also have the option of reporting under the old
reporting requirements. If they want to do this, though, they must write to the
Registrar to request it. This will give corporations enough time to prepare for
any new reporting requirements under the CATSI Act.
More information on reporting according to size can be found in the April
2007 edition of The Oracle.
A large corporation:
- will have reporting requirements similar to those of corporations under
the Corporations Act
- must notify the Registrar of its registered office, much the same as
similar sized corporations under the Corporations Act
- will have a corporation secretary—an official role—that will replace its
public officer. The role of the corporation secretary is to ensure that a
corporation is complying with legislative reporting and notification
requirements.
- Members will have extra rights like those under the Corporations Act.
- A person can ask ORIC to review many decisions made by the Registrar
and his delegates. This is an internal review.
- If the person is not satisfied with the internal review they can ask the
independent Administrative Appeals Tribunal to review the decision. These
review rights were not available under the ACA Act.
- Other decisions of the Registrar can be subject to court challenge. The
CATSI Act expands the jurisdiction of different courts to hear matters under
the CATSI legislation.
Back to top
- The Registrar can consider tradition and circumstances of Aboriginal
and Torres Strait Islander people in administering the CATSI Act.
- The Registrar has greater flexibility to consider the unique
circumstances of different corporations, for example, by exempting
specific corporations or classes of corporations from particular parts of
the Act.
- The CATSI Act gives corporations greater flexibility to design their
rules with regard to their traditions and circumstances.
- Directors’ duties encourage good corporate governance as directors
must make decisions in the best interests of the corporations and the
members. They include:
- a duty of care
- a duty to be honest
- a duty to disclose any conflicts of interest
- a duty to avoid conflicts of interest
- a duty to make sure the corporation does not trade while
insolvent—this means making sure that the corporation has the money
available to pay debts when they are due.
- The CATSI Act applies these duties not only to directors but also to
officers of the corporation (senior management). This is consistent with
the Corporations Act and it means that CEOs, finance officers and other
people in charge of the corporation meet the same standards of good
corporate governance that are required under the Corporations Act.
For more information, see the Duties of directors’ and other officers fact
sheet.
- The CATSI Act allows non-Indigenous members, however a majority of
members (and directors) must be Indigenous. Corporations only have to
allow non-Indigenous members if they want to or need to (for example,
spouses, step-children, employees of the corporation or experts). The
constitution of a corporation will still be able to require 100%
Indigenous membership—it is up to the corporation whether they want to
allow non-Indigenous members and how many.
- The CATSI Act also allows corporations to appoint or elect a
non-Indigenous person to their board, for example, a doctor or a lawyer
who may have particular skills the corporation needs. Again, this is up
to the corporation and if they want to allow non-Indigenous directors
this needs to be set out in the corporation’s rule book.
For more information, refer to the What is the Indigeneity requirement?
FAQ.
Back to top
- The Registrar will continue to regulate corporations and to use
enforcement powers. The CATSI Act modernises the regulatory and
enforcement powers currently in the ACA Act and also addresses problems
arising from deficiencies in the current regime.
- For example, the power in the ACA Act to call special general
meetings when a corporation cannot or will not, is expanded to include
AGMs. This aims to minimise disputes resulting from meetings not being
held.
- The CATSI Act also retains the power to appoint a person to examine a
corporation’s affairs. This means ‘healthy organisation checks’ can
continue to be used to identify problems and enable them to be solved by
the corporations themselves.
The Registrar’s powers are:
- to call and run general meetings and annual general meetings
- to appoint authorised officers to examine corporation’s affairs
- to appoint special administrator
- to issue compliance notices
- to give notice to produce books, provide information or answer questions
- to apply to the court for warrants to obtain information
- to disqualify people from managing corporations (see FAQ on How does a
person become disqualified?).
Back to top
- The Act specifically gives the Registrar the ability to support,
provide assistance and training to corporations through the functions of
the Registrar. For example, the Registrar will continue to help
corporations when incorporating, and will monitor and regulate through
providing a range of capacity building measures. For example, it gives:
- more transparent information about corporations on the website
- training and compliance support
- research and reporting on systemic issues.
- The Registrar will also be able to conduct research and public
education campaigns about good corporate governance.
- Yes, they will. ORIC is already helping corporations gear up for
the changes. This includes capacity building programs, such as training
and information. Other support and assistance will be provided, such as
self-help tools to design the corporation’s rule book.
- ORIC is also working with new and existing corporations to help
them prepare for the changes such as providing corporation redesign work
in line with some of the changes in the Act.
- ORIC is also working with other organisations and funding bodies
to make sure their services can be used to help corporations make the
necessary changes.
Requests for assistance can be made by contacting ORIC.
Back to top
- Under the CATSI Act, there are more penalties and offences but most
are based on offences in the Corporations Act. The aim is to support
better governance of corporations.
- For example, the CATSI Act prohibits false or misleading statements
being made either to the Registrar, or by an officer or employee of a
corporation to its directors, auditors and members.
- A new civil penalties scheme, based on the Corporation Act, is
introduced for serious contraventions of the CATSI legislation. It
includes the option for a penalty notice scheme as an alternative to
criminal prosecution. The Registrar can ask the Federal Court to declare
a contravention has occurred.
- Under other provisions, directors and officers who breach their
duties under the Act may be disqualified from managing corporations. For
more information, see the fact sheet Duties of directors and other
officers.
- People who are undischarged bankrupts or have been convicted of
certain offences (such as offences involving dishonesty with a minimum
penalty of imprisonment for 3 months) are automatically disqualified from
managing corporations.
- People who are disqualified from managing corporations under the
Corporations Act 2001 are also disqualified from managing Aboriginal
and Torres Strait Islander corporations, and vice versa.
- In some circumstances, the Registrar can apply to the court to have a
person disqualified if they have breached the Act or been involved in 2
or more corporations that have experienced corporate failure.
- The Registrar can disqualify people from managing corporations
(without seeking a court order) under some circumstances, provided that
the person has had an opportunity to respond to a notice of the
Registrar.
- The length of time that a person is disqualified for depends on why
they were disqualified.
- The Registrar and the court have the power to grant leave to a
disqualified person to manage a corporation.
- ORIC will maintain a register of people who have been disqualified
by the court or the Registrar.
- The ROA is the Registered Office Address.
- The DAA is the Document Access Address.
- The ROA or DAA is the main place of business where the corporation carries
out most of its activities.
- Large corporations must have a registered office address (ROA) and small
and medium corporations must have a document access address (DAA). This is so
that members and others can look at important documents such as the
corporation’s rules and records about officers.
- The ROA or DAA must be a physical address—it cannot be a postal address
(for example, a post office box). It can be a person’s home.
- People must be able to view the documents at an ROA between the hours of
10am and 12 midday and 2pm to 4pm on business days. People wanting to view
documents at a DAA have to give seven days written notice.
- Yes—corporations can be members of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander
corporations, but it must be written in the rule book.
- This is to allow for corporations that want to form peak bodies.
- The CATSI Act requires that corporations registered with ORIC remain in
majority control of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, so
corporations who tailor their rule book to allow for corporate membership must
ensure that this requirement is not breached—see What is the Indigeneity
requirement FAQ
The Indigeneity requirement means that corporations registered with ORATSIC
must have a minimum percentage of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander members:
- corporations with 5 or more members—at least 51% of their members must be
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people
- corporations with 2 to 4 members—all but one of their members must be
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people
- corporations with 1 member—that member must be an Aboriginal and Torres
Strait Islander person
Under the CATSI Act, Aboriginal person means a person of the Aboriginal race
of Australia, and Torres Strait Islander person means a descendant of an
Indigenous inhabitant of the Torres Strait Islands.
- If a corporation wants to pay their directors, it must be written in the
corporation’s rule book.
- The members must approve the amount of remuneration in a resolution put at
a general meeting.
- This does not stop a director from being paid as an employee of the
corporation.
- The corporation can also pay directors’ expenses if they’re reasonable for
travelling to meetings or attending to the business of the corporation.
- Under the CATSI Act, members can ask the corporation to tell them how much
directors are paid
- To transfer from the CATSI Act to another Australian state or territory
regulator, corporations must first pass a special resolution and then lodge an
application with the Registrar. The Registrar can then determine whether the
transfer is appropriate and deregister the corporation with ORIC.
- Existing bodies corporate can apply to ORIC to be regulated under the
CATSI Act, subject to any obligations they may owe to their current regulator.
- Existing Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander corporations can apply to
ORIC to amalgamate as one corporation under the CATSI Act.
- When the CATSI Act begins, corporations are no longer required to use
their corporation common seal.
- However, if they wish to continue using their seal, they can do so. The
only requirement is that if the corporation changes its name (and wants to
still use a common seal), the new common seal must show its Indigenous
Corporations Number (ICN) on it. If the corporation does not change its name,
it can continue using its old common seal without the ICN.
- ORIC will let corporations know what their ICN is.
Under the ACA Act a corporation has a set of rules called a constitution.
Under the CATSI Act corporations will have an internal governance framework—that
is, a rule book agreed to by the members, which says how a corporation operates.
This rule book will have three parts:
- a constitution—rules special to that corporation
- replaceable rules—rules in the Act that the members can accept as is or
change. Once the corporation changes any of these rules, they then become part
of its constitution.
- set rules—these are provisions in the Act that apply to all corporations,
although corporations may be able to apply to the Registrar for exemption from
some of them.
The rules about related party transactions promote transparency,
accountability and good governance. They require corporations to obtain member
approval to give benefits to related parties.
- a group or entity controlling an Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander
corporation
- director
- spouses and de factos of the above two parties
- parents
- children
- finance
- property
- buying / selling assets
- leasing assets
- supplying or receiving services
Through a resolution with an explanatory statement. The resolution must also
be lodged with the Registrar.
Related party transactions can occur without member approval if the
transaction is reasonable. This includes remuneration for employees or payments
made to meet Native Title legislation obligations.
Back to top
Page updated: 30 Apr 08